<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Earl on Earl | AI partner for elite sports and stadia</title><link>https://earl.partners/</link><description>Recent content in Earl on Earl | AI partner for elite sports and stadia</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://earl.partners/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mind the gap: the revenue opportunity major sports venues are overlooking</title><link>https://earl.partners/resources/mind-the-gap-stadium-revenue-opportunity/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://earl.partners/resources/mind-the-gap-stadium-revenue-opportunity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In an era where stadiums and major event venues are expected to be year-round commercial engines, the business models of many operators remain anchored to matchday revenue or singular event income. Yet the economic landscape of sport and live events is shifting quickly. Commercial revenue now often outpaces matchday revenue at the top level, with some clubs reporting that matchday income represents less than 20 per cent of total turnover, while other commercial and broadcast streams dominate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DAZN's ViewLift acquisition is a fan-data deal, not a streaming deal</title><link>https://earl.partners/resources/dazn-viewlift-fan-data-deal/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://earl.partners/resources/dazn-viewlift-fan-data-deal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On 30 April, DAZN Group confirmed its acquisition of ViewLift for around $100m in cash and equity. The deal was widely covered as US streaming consolidation, a play to fill the regional sports network vacuum left by the collapse of Main Street Sports Group. That storyline is correct as far as it goes. It also misses what the acquisition actually is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="sc-stats" data-cols="3"&gt;
 
 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;$100m&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;DAZN&amp;#39;s headline price for ViewLift&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;15&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;professional sports teams already on the platform&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;12 months&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;window for the next Premier League SaaS deals&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h2 id="what-dazn-really-bought"&gt;What DAZN really bought&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DAZN did not buy ViewLift for the streaming infrastructure. It bought ViewLift for what sits underneath the streaming, the identity resolution, the consent layer, and the interaction that already runs the direct relationship between 15 professional sports teams and their fans. The streaming is the wrapper whilst the fan data platform is the asset.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Premier League SCR turns commercial revenue into wage cap headroom</title><link>https://earl.partners/resources/premier-league-scr-commercial-wage-cap-headroom/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://earl.partners/resources/premier-league-scr-commercial-wage-cap-headroom/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Premier League&amp;rsquo;s move from Profit and Sustainability Rules to the Squad Cost Ratio takes effect for the 2026/27 season. Clubs approved it in November 2025. The final PSR assessment lands this spring. From next season, a club&amp;rsquo;s permitted spend on wages, transfer fees and agent commissions is capped at 70% of football-related income for clubs in European competition, and 85% for clubs playing only domestically.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="sc-stats" data-cols="3"&gt;
 
 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;70%&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;SCR cap on squad cost for clubs in European competition&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;85%&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;cap for clubs playing only domestically&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;5 of 20&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;clubs whose commercial calendar matches the transfer window&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h2 id="scr-is-not-a-finance-reform-it-is-an-operating-change"&gt;SCR is not a finance reform, it is an operating change&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most coverage has framed this as a finance reform. It is not. It is a change in how commercial revenue translates into squad capacity, and it puts the commercial team inside the sporting equation for the first time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Premier League shirt sponsors and the £80m measurement problem</title><link>https://earl.partners/resources/premier-league-shirt-sponsors-measurement-problem/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://earl.partners/resources/premier-league-shirt-sponsors-measurement-problem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The headline number now sits at around £80m. That is the aggregate front-of-shirt sponsorship value Premier League clubs are reported to be losing as the betting-brand ban takes effect for 2026/27. The Irish Times put the figure in print on 5 April. The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Gambling Reform reinforced the direction of travel on 8 May. Ten clubs still do not have a confirmed front-of-shirt partner for the season ahead. Outside the Big Six, replacement offers are reportedly down by around 50% on what betting was paying.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Premium stadium economics and the sensitivity worth stress-testing</title><link>https://earl.partners/resources/premium-stadium-economics-stress-test/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://earl.partners/resources/premium-stadium-economics-stress-test/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On 3 May, theesk.org published a scenario analysis of what relegation would mean for Tottenham Hotspur&amp;rsquo;s financial and capital structure. The piece is a useful exercise on its own terms. It is also a stress test that every Premier League club building or expanding a premium stadium should be running, and most are not currently running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="sc-stats" data-cols="3"&gt;
 
 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;35-45%&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;premium share of matchday turnover at top stadia&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;70%&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;SCR squad cost cap for European clubs&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;365&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;days of revenue that don&amp;#39;t depend on fixture quality&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h2 id="premium-revenue-is-not-annuity-shaped-it-is-equity-shaped"&gt;Premium revenue is not annuity-shaped, it is equity-shaped&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Premium hospitality and premium seats now account for 35 to 45% of matchday turnover at Tottenham&amp;rsquo;s stadium. The same shape, with slightly different magnitudes, sits in Arsenal&amp;rsquo;s plans for an expanded Emirates, in Newcastle&amp;rsquo;s medium-term stadium thinking, and in the redevelopment conversations elsewhere in the league. These plans are typically presented to ownership and lenders as debt-style annuities. A stable, contracted premium revenue base that supports the financing stack and underwrites the build cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stadium naming rights and the rotation in the brand pool</title><link>https://earl.partners/resources/stadium-naming-rights-brand-pool-rotation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://earl.partners/resources/stadium-naming-rights-brand-pool-rotation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On 29 April, The Stadium Business reported that Orange&amp;rsquo;s 10-year naming rights deal at the Stade Vélodrome in Marseille is ending. There is no equivalent-length replacement on the table. The story sits inside a broader set of signals about how long-term naming rights are being priced today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="sc-stats" data-cols="3"&gt;
 
 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;£100m&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;Allianz Twickenham extension over 10 years&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;£10m/yr&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;Hill Dickinson naming rights at Bramley-Moore Dock&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

 &lt;div class="sc-stat"&gt;
 &lt;div class="sc-stat-value"&gt;2034&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="sc-stat-label"&gt;Spotify Barcelona partnership now runs to&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h2 id="the-first-reading-is-wrong"&gt;The first reading is wrong&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A first reading might be that the long-term anchor deal is in trouble. That reading would be wrong. Long-term deals are getting signed. In the last 18 months alone, Aviva committed to long-term naming rights on YTL Live&amp;rsquo;s new Bristol arena, announced on 16 February 2026. Allianz extended its partnership with Twickenham at a reported £100m over 10 years. Hill Dickinson took naming rights at Everton&amp;rsquo;s Bramley-Moore Dock at around £10m a year. Barcelona extended its Spotify partnership until 2034. Atlético Madrid&amp;rsquo;s Metropolitano now runs as a Riyadh Air-named venue through to 2033.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>